Saxophone Tenor Selmer Super Action 80 Serie 2 Review

The Selmer Super Action 80 Series II tenor is a Selmer Paris professional saxophone made during the 1980s–1990s era that many players choose for studio, jazz, and gigging work because of its consistent build and a focused midrange voice that sits well in mixes.

Snapshot: reputation and context

Selmer Paris branded the horn as the Super Action 80 Series II, commonly abbreviated SA80 II; players seek it for reliability across players and rooms, not raw vintage grit.

The model earned a reputation for consistent manufacturing standards after the Mark VI era, offering a modern response and ergonomic keywork that many players find predictable under pressure.

Who this saxophone suits

Ideal users range from advanced-intermediates to professionals who need a tenorial voice that blends in sections and cuts for solos without sounding aggressive.

It performs well for studio tracking, modern jazz, pop/rock horn sections, and freelance gigging where intonation stability and quick response matter.

Key selling points

Expect a focused midrange with warm core, quick response in the center register, and keywork that favors speed and reliability over vintage looseness.

Compared to a Mark VI it presents less raw breadth and more consistency; compared to modern Reference lines it offers a distinct mid-centered voice rather than a purposely vintage voicing.

Origins and lineage

Selmer developed the Super Action 80 family as the next step after the Mark VI, aiming for manufacturing consistency and a refined response while keeping a professional tonal palette.

Series II reflects production choices in the 1980s–early 1990s: tighter quality control on keywork and pad setup than earlier SA80 runs, and tooling updates that affected venting and neck fit.

Later Series III and Reference models shifted voicing and chamber design further toward modern preferences and boutique mouthpiece pairings.

How Series II differs from Series I and later lines

Series I instruments often show more variability in pad heights and spring tension; Series II tightened those tolerances, giving players more predictable action out of the case.

Series III and Reference models introduced altered chamber shapes, different neck taper profiles, and voicing aimed at varied tonal goals, so feel and projection shift noticeably between lines.

Production details and variants

Series II production centers on the late 1980s through the early 1990s, with serial ranges that overlap adjacent runs; use serial guides as a cross-check rather than a sole determinant.

Common finishes include gold lacquer, silver-plate, and raw brass; limited or special editions exist but are rarer and usually carry aftermarket premiums.

Engraving styles vary by year and factory batch; heavier, deeper engraving can indicate earlier examples, while lighter, machine-cut patterns often show later production.

Spotting factory vs aftermarket work

Factory work shows uniform soldering, consistent pad brands installed at manufacture, and matching finish wear patterns; aftermarket mods often present mixed pad brands, hand-solder fingerprints, or mismatched screw heads.

Check neck tenon fits, pad brands and serial numbers on neck and body, and whether any visible solder joints differ in color or finish from factory joints.

Decoding serial numbers and authenticity checks

Verify that serial numbers on the body, neck, and case match expected ranges and engraving styles for Selmer Paris; mismatches suggest swapped parts or partial refits.

Inspect neck tenon faces for fresh machining or rebushing; signs of amateur work include irregular solder blobs, uneven tenon shoulders, or tool marks on the neck cork seat.

Request repair invoices, original case, and any mouthpiece receipts; a documented service history significantly raises confidence and resale value.

Construction, bore, neck and keywork

SA80 II uses a brass body with a conical bore profile shaped to focus the center register and keep projection controlled; the neck taper plays a major role in resistance and upper-register behavior.

Keywork is modern Selmer: ergonomic cluster, balanced spring tension, and rollover pearl keys on common models that favor fast execution and lower fatigue for long sets.

Typical pad setups use leather pads with resonators and a conventional octave mechanism; pad seat quality and resonator style affect projection and sweetness.

Neck and bore specifics

Neck taper and tenon fit influence resistance and core tone: a tighter tenon fit yields quicker response but can increase backpressure; a looser fit gives air flow and warmth at the expense of some focus.

Swapped or modified necks change intonation and projection; always play an instrument with its original or verified compatible neck before buying.

Simple tests: press the neck into the body and listen for airflow turbulence, check for even cork compression, and visually confirm the seam is flush without gaps.

Signature sound and playability

The SA80 II fingerprint is a centered, warm midrange that blends smoothly in ensembles while keeping enough edge to be heard on leads when pushed.

Low register delivers fullness without boom if the horn is well set up; center register is sweet and immediate; altissimo access is reliable but depends heavily on neck fit and mouthpiece choice.

Setup elements like pad height, spring tension and neck alignment can shift the character from sweeter to more focused quickly, so small tech adjustments matter.

Intonation tendencies and management

Expect register-dependent quirks: low notes can read slightly flat on some horns, center register generally in tune, and high notes may trend sharp if mouthpiece placement is shallow.

Quick fixes on the stand: move mouthpiece in or out to compensate centering issues, try a slightly firmer reed or adjust octave key tension for top-register control, and test alternate neck positions.

When persistent pitch problems remain after basic adjustments, schedule a tech-level check for pad heights, neck taper alignment, or mouthpiece shank seating issues.

Series II versus Mark VI and modern Selmer models

Compared with Mark VI, Series II sounds less broad-spectrum and more even; Mark VI offers a warmer, more complex color favored by vintage-seekers, while Series II prioritizes reliability.

Against Series III or Reference lines, Series II sits between vintage warmth and modern voicing: it’s more predictable than the Mark VI and less engineered toward vintage replication than the Reference 54.

Choose Series II if you want a dependable, studio-friendly tenor with a balanced midrange; choose Mark VI for vintage color, and Reference for modern-flexible voicing.

Real-world scenarios that favor each model

Studio lead or section work often favors Series II for its consistent intonation and blendable midrange that tracks well in overdubs and live mixes.

Solo jazz or vintage-leaning projects may call for a Mark VI or Reference 54 to capture broader harmonic complexity and the classic voice associated with many recordings.

For students or budget-minded giggers, a well-set Series II typically delivers the best value-to-performance ratio.

Common mechanical and acoustic problems

Watch for wear at pad seats, pivot screw play, bent rods, sticky tone holes, and loose octave key mechanisms; these show up as buzzing, sluggish action, or air leaks.

Acoustic red flags include dead spots, uneven resonance across chromatic passages, and octave leaks that cause poor top-register response—usually linked to pad sealing or octave vent issues.

Run a leak test with key-by-key sealing and a light or leak spray; if sealing fails in a pattern, suspect pad seating or undercutting problems rather than player technique.

Practical fixes vs professional repair

Safe home fixes: use light key oil on pivot screws, apply cork grease to neck corks, swab interiors after play, and gently clean mouthpiece facing—these maintain performance between services.

Avoid DIY pad replacement, dent removal, rebushing, or solder work; those tasks need a trained tech to preserve tone and alignment on a Series II.

Ballpark repair costs: common pad job or partial overhaul $300–$800, full overhaul $700–$1,500, neck rebush or tenon work $100–$400, dent removal $50–$300 depending on severity.

Mouthpiece, reed and ligature pairings

Pair Series II with medium to medium-large chamber mouthpieces for balanced focus and warmth; classic options include Meyer-style, Otto Link medium-large setups, and modern designs like JodyJazz or Theo Wanne for more projection.

Reed choice matters: for jazz lead try 3.0–3.5 strengths on natural cane with a slightly brighter cut; for studio/ballad work step down to 2.5–3.0 for more flexibility and warmth.

Ligature tips: use a firm but responsive ligature such as Vandoren or Rovner to maintain clarity without choking the center core; experiment with placements for tone shaping.

Setup examples for target sounds

Jazz lead: medium-large chamber mouthpiece, 3.0–3.5 reed, ligature tightened for attack, mouthpiece rolled slightly away from teeth to increase projection and brightness.

Warm studio/ballad: larger chamber or darker facing, reed 2.5–3.0 for responsiveness, lighter ligature tension to allow core warmth and dynamic control.

Classical or altissimo control: tighter facing, reed 2.5–3.0 with stiffer vamp, focus on steady air support and shorter embouchure aperture to sharpen top-end clarity.

Buying used: inspection checklist

Play-test: confirm airtightness, check full-range response, test the octave mechanism across registers, and run long-tone tuning checks for stability.

Visual checklist: examine solder joints, neck tenon wear, pad condition and seating, key bending, and lacquer integrity; inconsistent solder or mismatched pad brands are negotiation points.

Negotiate with repair estimates in hand; offer contingencies like “price subject to tech inspection” to protect against unseen issues discovered later.

Typical price ranges and value drivers

As of recent market patterns, expect average-condition Series II tenors to fall in a mid-range that undercuts vintage Mark VI prices but sits above student horns; good-condition instruments command premiums for original cases and documented service history.

Features that raise value: original case, matching serials, full-service records, low-play wear, desirable finishes, and included mouthpieces from reputable makers.

Regional demand and timing affect prices; urban markets and end-of-school-year buying cycles often shift bargaining power and availability.

Upgrades, rebuilds and long-term servicing

Common upgrades that materially improve playability include quality pad replacement, neck rebushing or re-tapering by a specialist, optimized spring tension, and careful solder alignment for tone holes.

Decide between full overhaul and incremental fixes by estimating total cost vs remaining years of expected service; overhauls usually make sense if the instrument has good body condition and no serious corrosion.

Signs of a successful overhaul: consistent pad seal across the range, smooth action with correct spring tension, improved tuning stability, and a clear warranty from the tech.

Choosing a repair shop or tech

Pick a tech with documented experience on Selmer Paris models and ask for before/after photos and references; specific Selmer experience matters more than generic repair claims.

Ask which pad brands they use, how they align the neck seating, their solder techniques for tone holes, and expected turnaround time; get a written quote with parts listed.

Compare multiple quotes and prefer shops that show clear measurement procedures and post-service setup adjustments as part of the price.

Care, daily maintenance and storage

Daily: swab the horn after playing, remove moisture from the neck and body, and wipe keys to prevent corrosion; monthly: inspect pads and oil pivot screws sparingly.

Store in a stable environment away from extreme temperature swings and high humidity; use a sturdy case with padding and consider desiccant packs for long storage periods.

For transport, secure the neck and mouthpiece, loosen straps slightly to relieve tension on screws, and avoid placing heavy objects on the case.

Market trends and investment outlook

Interest in Series II instruments remains steady among working musicians; collector premiums favor original-condition examples with provenance or notable player ownership.

Long-term desirability depends more on playability and service history than hype; a well-maintained Series II will likely retain practical value for gigging players.

Notable players and demo references

Several contemporary players have used Super Action 80 instruments in recordings and live work; listen for consistent midrange projection and blend in horn-section demos and studio sessions labeled SA80 or Series II.

Use recorded references and YouTube demos as audition targets: compare recorded tone against live play-tests to judge how a given horn will sit in your own projects.

Quick decision roadmap: should you buy one?

Buy if you want a dependable tenor with focused midrange, documented service history, matching neck and body, and repairable wear at a reasonable cost.

Pass if you find extensive corrosion, multiple mismatched parts without documentation, or repairs that exceed a realistic fraction of the horn’s expected market value.

Next steps for buyers: request serial verification, play with your usual mouthpiece setup, schedule a tech inspection, and factor repair estimates into your offer.

Resources, communities and suppliers

Check Selmer Paris official resources for serial and model references, join Sax on the Web forums and relevant Facebook groups for community advice, and watch demo channels focused on saxophone gear for sound comparisons.

Find parts and mouthpieces through established makers like Vandoren, Meyer-style suppliers, JodyJazz and Theo Wanne, and consult local certified repair shops for genuine parts and service.

Keep a shortlist of trusted techs and dealers before you negotiate; having quotes and references will sharpen your bargaining position and protect value.

Photo of author

Jonathan

Jonathan Reed is the editor of Epicalab, where he brings his lifelong passion for the arts to readers around the world. With a background in literature and performing arts, he has spent over a decade writing about opera, theatre, and visual culture. Jonathan believes in making the arts accessible and engaging, blending thoughtful analysis with a storyteller’s touch. His editorial vision for Epicalab is to create a space where classic traditions meet contemporary voices, inspiring both seasoned enthusiasts and curious newcomers to experience the transformative power of creativity.